Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Nazi Victory Map -PART 1- by Totentanz0 Nazi Victory Map -PART 1- by Totentanz0
Nazi Victory Map
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.mediafire.com/view/wwhan1n…
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add a Comment:
 
:icongermanyisawesome:
Germanyisawesome Featured By Owner Sep 21, 2014
Would be good for Global warming and population control
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Sep 21, 2014
Especially the second.
Reply
:icongermanyisawesome:
Germanyisawesome Featured By Owner Sep 21, 2014
Even though it is appalling to think of that and all of this in this way, but, and this is not a "I wish this happened" Or "I am happy this happened" but with those 11 million still alive , that would be about a billion after a few generations and the environment would prolly be much worse
Reply
:iconalvynsharp:
AlvynSharp Featured By Owner Sep 21, 2013
This scenario is unrealistic. I highly doubt that the Germans would try to hold all of Europe like that or invade America.

Here is a more likely German victory map of Europe: www.valtakunta.eu/eurooppa/kar…
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Sep 22, 2013
Trust me, you are not the first one to point it out! This map is not from an alternate-history scenario. It’s just a somewhat maximalist collection of Nazi aims. It’s more cumulative than speculative…
I knew that site. I can’t read Finnish so I just basically looked at the maps. Their interactive map is delightful. I expecially appreciated the enlarged Ostland and the Gotenland. I have to say that I’d personally prefer the Somme-Geneva line as the new border between France and Germany. And in case of Italian capitulation, which I suppose in this case, I’m usually expecting to see the annexation of OZAV & OZAK. I also believe that the correct new German name for Sevastopol should be TheodErichshafen and not TheodOrichshafen, Theoderic the Great being called Theoderich der Große in German.
Reply
:icondonaldtrump97:
DonaldTrump97 Featured By Owner Edited Sep 22, 2014  Hobbyist Artist
Great Map :)
The another map is not easy to understand. (the Finnish map). But the name of Sevastopol was really Theoderichshafen
Reply
:iconamongthesatanic:
AmongTheSatanic Featured By Owner Mar 8, 2013  Hobbyist Artist
I love the details you uncover and then put onto these maps. I really wish someone could compile all of the Nazi's plans and such like you post and make a huge reference book about it.

I don't particularly care about the Nazi's, but the things they did, the reasons why, and all their plans have and always will intrigue me until I read it all :o
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2013
I would buy that book!
Reply
:icontodyo1798:
Todyo1798 Featured By Owner Mar 4, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
I think your next project for this series (if you're looking for one that is) could be the Nazi's "successfully" implenting the Atlantropa Project.
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Mar 7, 2013
AFAIK the project Atlantropa wasn’t particularly popular among the Nazis (apart from “The Man in the High Castle” ones).
Not to mention that for me it would take ten times as long to get to the Adriatic Sea!
Reply
:icontodyo1798:
Todyo1798 Featured By Owner Mar 7, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
True, but it does suit National Socialism very well. It's so ridiculous and the benefits are miniscule compared to the cost of implementing it, plus the chances of it actually working are variable to say the least.

Suits the Nazi's down to the ground!
Reply
:iconarminius1871:
Arminius1871 Featured By Owner Jun 3, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I dislike the Nazis and hate their crimes, but I think I can not agree that you say the german engineers, scientists and architects of that time were dumb or stupid.

Even the Nazis overtook the society and the country, the Germans were since the 19th century of the most creative and intelligent people Europe had, and the date 1933, didn´t make idiots from all of them.

And it´s sad, that most people don´t know why the Germans followed Hitler, it was not because of racism, but because of all the crisis and the chaos caused by the french dictate of versailles after the first world war.
Reply
:icontodyo1798:
Todyo1798 Featured By Owner Jun 3, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
I never said German engineers, scientists or architects were dumb or stupid.

I said the Nazi's (as in the German political and military leadership from 1939-45) were dumb or stupid.

Yes, I realise there's a difference, I've been posting historical stuff on this site long enough that you should know I can differentiate between Germans as a whole from 1933-45, and members of the National Socialist German Workers Party.
Reply
:iconarminius1871:
Arminius1871 Featured By Owner Jun 4, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Ok sounded to me like you think they all were dumb, because to be member of the Nazi party did not automatically mean you are an evil racist, many people had to be member, to get higehr positions or just to work on, some people became even members without knowing it, for example many soldiers in the war didn´t even know, that they were made members in the homeland.

But I see I did you missunderstand :)
Reply
:iconarminius1871:
Arminius1871 Featured By Owner Jun 4, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Ok sounded to me like you think they all were dumb, because to be member of the Nazi party did not automatically mean you are an evil racist, many people had to be member, to get higehr positions or just to work on, some people became even members without knowing it, for example many soldiers in the war didn´t even know, that they were made members in the homeland.

But I see I did you missunderstand :)
Reply
:iconnublarraptor1:
NublarRaptor1 Featured By Owner Jan 5, 2013  Student General Artist
Well were fucked...
Reply
:iconjegudiel2013:
Jegudiel2013 Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2012
Nazi would have won if they would have followed steps...

1- Nazi-Soviet Non Aggression should have been respected.
2- After taking over most of Europe (except UK) Nazis call for Armistice with USA/UK. English Channel becomes "Militarized Zone".
3- Nazis gain Arabs as Economic Allies.
4- Breakage of Alliance with Japanese Empire (left to fight alone with USA)
5- WW2 Ends early
6- Nazis get Nuclear Weapons (no using, show of force only) maybe?...
7- Empire grows ECONOMICALLY...
Reply
:iconmichaljewgirl:
MiChaLJEWgiRL Featured By Owner Sep 18, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
mein gott!!!!!!
Deutsch Geschichte in einer ganzen Reihe von Wörtern Format!
Reply
:icontylero79:
tylero79 Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2012  Student General Artist
Mind if I use this for something? I need a well detailed map like this for a project I'm working on.
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2012
No problem. Go ahead!
Reply
:icontylero79:
tylero79 Featured By Owner Jun 10, 2012  Student General Artist
Reply
:iconanw-rev:
anw-rev Featured By Owner Feb 12, 2012
Hey, I need your help. I kinda lost about few things.

What are terms for these areas:

*Germany and areas to Alsace-Lothringen and Lithuania

*Those areas plus Reichostland up to the Ural Mountains

*Those areas plus Mittelafrika and other colonies

I'm confused between "Greater Germany", "Greater German Reich", and"Greater Germanic Empire" (if there is such term)

Thanks!
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Feb 13, 2012
Interesting question! Ok. First of all, this nomenclature is pretty fluid. This is my personal understanding of it:

-Altreich ("Old Reich"): territories of Nazi Germany before 1938 (before the annexation of Austria, Sudeten, etc...)

-Großdeutsches Reich ("Greater German Reich"): Altreich plus distinctly ethnic German territories outside of it (Austria, Sudeten, Alsace, some parts of Poland, etc...). "Etnic German" is itself an ambiguous term and surely the Nazis could have extended it as they liked. But you get the basic idea.

-Großgermanisches Reich {Deutscher Nation} ("Greater Germanic Reich {of the German nation}"): previous territories plus those areas of Europe that could be claimed to be Germanic for some reason. This can be easily visualized looking at Germanic speaking areas (other than the previously strictly "German" speaking areas), such as the Netherlands, Flanders, Norway, Sweden, Danemark... Great Britain is usually excluded. Or, more consistently, places with a "Germanic" history or ancient "Germanic" blood, which include also parts of France that were under Frankish, Burgundian or Norman domination or Northern Italy. I usually consider to-be-Germanized-Eastern-Europe/Asia (but not Siberia) as an extention of this sphere. The Mittelafrikanisches Kolonialreich plus maybe Neudeutschland in Brasil, the Dutch East Indies ond other colonies could be added to any of these terms. But they were to be external territories, to be exploited but not, in the near future, to be extensively populated by Aryans.

-There is an also an interesting quotation from Himmler that apparently extends this never ending Nazi matryoshka doll. Of course, you can find it in one of my "references pages" ([link]) :
"Against the background of these dangers, he argued, it was imperative to ‘take the road upwards’ and not stop at the creation of a’Greater German Reich’. ‘After the Greater German Reich comes the Germanic Empire, and next the Germanic-Gothic Empire all the way to the Urals, and then perhaps even the Gothic-Frankish-Carolingian Empire. The Reich Leader SS believed that we actually had a claim to that; the others simply had not noticed it yet."
So we could add:
-Germanisch-Gotisches Reich ("Germanic-Gothic Empire"): Everything to the Urals (or to any other eastern border they wanted). The use of Gothic is probably to reclaim those areas that were under "ancient Ostrogothic domination". The same eritage was used as an excuse to annex southern Ukraine (Gotengau).
-Gotisch-Fränkisch-Karolingisches Reich ("Gothic-Frankish-Carolingian"): Everything plus rump France? I don't really know...

The ultimate step, as usual from Himmler, is the:
-Germanisches Weltreich (Germanic World Empire): do I really need to explain this?

Hope it helps.
Reply
:iconanw-rev:
anw-rev Featured By Owner Feb 29, 2012
I can't reply this because your explanation is just too precious
I've save it!

Thanks!
Reply
:icon2195razielim:
2195Razielim Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Nazis from todays generation exist some places of the world there is a known gang in Sydney I believe a movie was made about it
Reply
:icondjgrhs:
djgrhs Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2011
Well, the information is very good. I think it needs writed references, if someone has problems with the links. And the map is very good too, but it needs something more (I can´t explain myself). Very good work.
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Sep 4, 2011
Thanks!
I'm not sure I understand your suggestion. Are you suggesting me to add more references, especially for the linked material? I thought that having 3 monstrous pages of references was going to be annoyingly long, go figure! (^_~)
Reply
:icontombombardier:
TomBombardier Featured By Owner Jul 15, 2011
Did you find all these books on your own, or find the references on various sites?
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Jul 25, 2011
I don’t actually own every book listed. I do own some of them, for example: Visions of Victory: The Hopes of Eight World War II Leaders; Hitler's War Aims, Ideology, the Nazi State and the Course of Expansion; Hitler’s War Aims, the establishment of the New Order; The memoirs of Doctor Felix Kersten; Hitler's Table Talk 1941-1944 (Italian version); Fascism's European empire: Italian occupation during the Second World War (Italian version). Most of the others should be totally or partially readable online (for example on Google Books).
Reply
:iconspiritswriter123:
Spiritswriter123 Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
I'm favoriting this in hopes that I would eventually read that, but I doubt it. sorry, but still your welcome for the fave.

Suggestion: make the desc. shorter
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2011
Thank you for the fave.
I'm sorry, but the description is probably only getting longer, the text being a collection of quotes. It's not an alternate universe fiction by me (I authored only the first two lines!). :-P
Reply
:iconlyra33vega:
Lyra33Vega Featured By Owner Apr 3, 2011  Student Traditional Artist
...
SWEET MOTHER OF FUCK--!! O.O
Awesome. :D
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Apr 5, 2011
Thanks! :-)
Reply
:iconlyra33vega:
Lyra33Vega Featured By Owner Apr 5, 2011  Student Traditional Artist
You're welcome! :)
Reply
:iconanw-rev:
anw-rev Featured By Owner Nov 21, 2010
MITTELAFRIKA!! Maybe in this timeline the Angel's Lance space elevator truly built on top of Mount Kenya or Kilimanjaro
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Nov 14, 2010
Thank you very much for the links! The first map is very interesting (for the 2° one, I'm not very much into post-punk music... ...just joking ;-), found it here [link])
About your future project... Wow. I'm already a fan of it! It's always so difficult to find reliable sources and maps about this topic and a coprehensive site would be painfully amazing! I'm totally looking forward to see it.
Reply
:iconmorganhauser-2010:
MorganHauser-2010 Featured By Owner Nov 14, 2010
Okay, answering your questions in order:
- Yes I do.
- Yes, quite a lot.
- I got them from Rosenberg’s work on eastern administrative planning, much of which has been charted before (although few of it provided online). This easily available map depicts the absolute earliest of his revisions, and shows both Ural and West-Siberia (situated in between Ural, Muscovy, Turkestan, Tannu-Tuva, and the Yenisei river).
[link]
- No, just a curious fellow.
- That’s my intention. I’m still in the process of doing research and gathering the necessary information, but eventually (sometime next year probably) I’ll get down to producing an entire series of maps depicting the type of world that these people tried to create and hosting it on a new website. Accuracy takes time I'm afraid.

PS: See this and scroll down to the relevant passage on South Africa.
[link](Nazism)

PPS: A wise assessment. You need to remember that institutions such as the Generalgouvernement or the Reichskommissariats were ultimately just transitional in nature, as they were intended to be completely and directly integrated into the Nazi state. Furthermore, it's actually the entire gist of Nazism: because its racial expansionism had no ideological limits to it there is no logical end-result for it other than total victory or total defeat. If the policies that Hitler’s political party had set out would have continued unabated for decades to come, the present world would be completely dominated by an inhumanly cruel and nightmarishly totalitarian super-state.
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Nov 13, 2010
Wow! There's so much information out there! And isn't always easy to differentiate reliable sources from rumor.
I'll try to find the "Selling War: The British Propaganda Campaign Against American "Neutrality" book.
Do you have the real boundaries of Ural and West-Sibirien? Do they look extremely different from mine? Is there a chance to find a map showing them in Internet? Am I a stalker? :-)
Seriously, have you ever thought about creating a similar Nazi-Victory speculative map? You seem to be very well informed about this topic I bet it would look amazing.

PS: Do you have any information about plans regarding South Africa?
PSS: Sometimes I've the distinct feeling that, to represent the real territorial claims of the Third Reich, I should have made a plain grey map... :-)
Reply
:iconmorganhauser-2010:
MorganHauser-2010 Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2010
I know - I was the one who put most of that information online. I do actually have the exact boundaries of Ural and West-Siberia. The two Nordlands are the ones that are really hard to find any accurate information on.

Re: South America: Read "Selling War: The British Propaganda Campaign Against American "Neutrality" in World War II" by Nicholas John Cull, as it goes into detailed length on the origins of both the real map and that British forgery. To sum up the real proposed political changes:
* Argentina and Brazil expand pretty much the the same way there as they do here;
* New Spain is pure fiction;
* The larger states of South America such as Peru, Venezuela, and Colombia aren't just gobbled up by other countries.

On top of that, Hitler also seemed to be interested in the prospect of establishing future German colonies in Argentina after reading a book on the matter that piqued his interest ("Auswanderungs-Möglichkeiten in Argentinien"). According to Hermann Rauschning (a very dubious source, to put it mildy) he also vowed that the Nazi government would create a 'New Germany' for itself in Brazil.
Reply
:iconmorganhauser-2010:
MorganHauser-2010 Featured By Owner Nov 6, 2010
Thanks for charting all this information Totentantz. Where did you find info on the borders of Reichskommissariats West-Nordland, Ost-Nordland, and Ural? BTW, the South American map was a British forgery. There actually was such a map produced by the local departments of the German Foreign Office in several South American countries, but it looked quite a bit different from this one.
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Nov 7, 2010
I'm sorry but I wasn't actually able to find a map of eastern Reichskommissariats... I just extrapolated them from the few informations I was able to collect about them. For example, from Wikipedia:
* Reichskommissariat Ural (central and south Ural and nearest territories, created from planned east Russian European territorial reorganization).
* Reichskommissariat West-Sibirien (future west Siberia and Novosibirsk held lands).
* Reichskommissariat West-Nordland (Russian European Arctic north coasts).
* Reichskommissariat Ost-Nordland (northwest Siberian Arctic north coasts).
When possible, I followed the preexisting Russian subdivisions because I noticed this (strange?) habit in the Rosenberg map, expecially in the Reichskommissariat Moskau. But I must admit it is almost totally speculative... Sorry...

Regarding the South American map, I was aware it was a fake map, but it was the only reference I was able to find. I'm really interested about the (real) one you mentioned. Is there a picture of it somewhere?

If you have any other suggestion, feel free to post it!
Reply
:iconnawu523:
Nawu523 Featured By Owner Nov 3, 2010
Awesome, but I don't think the Switz would joined the Germans... haha.
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Nov 4, 2010
You're right. Switzerland should have annexed Germany: [link]
Reply
:iconnawu523:
Nawu523 Featured By Owner Nov 4, 2010
LMAO! Coincedence? I got my butt beaten by the Switz when I was playing as France in a game... haha.
Reply
:iconynot1989:
YNot1989 Featured By Owner Oct 2, 2010  Hobbyist Digital Artist
This is an awesome map, and I've been looking for one with subdivisions this detailed for what seems like an eternity. Would you mind terribly if I used it for some of my own work?
Reply
:icontotentanz0:
Totentanz0 Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2010
I would be honoured!
Feel free to use (and abuse) it.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
September 29, 2010
Image Size
645 KB
Resolution
4974×2519
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
21,117 (11 today)
Favourites
58 (who?)
Comments
46
Downloads
948
×